Radical vaginal trachelectomy: long-term oncologic and fertility outcomes in patients with early cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Radical vaginal trachelectomy is a fertility-preserving treatment for patients with early cervical cancer. Despite encouraging oncologic and fertility outcomes, large studies on radical vaginal trachelectomy are lacking. METHOD: Demographic, histological, fertility, and follow-up data of consecutive patients who underwent radical vaginal trachelectomy between March 1995 and August 2021 were prospectively recorded and retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 471 patients of median age 33 years (range 21-44) were included. 83% (n=390) were nulliparous women. Indications were International Federation of Gynecology and Oncology (FIGO, 2009) stages IA1 with lymphvascular space involvement (LVSI) in 43 (9%) patients, IA1 multifocal in 8 (2%), IA2 in 92 (20%), IB1 in 321 (68%), and IB2/IIA in 7 (1%) patients, respectively. LVSI was detected in 31% (n=146). Lymph node staging was performed in 151 patients (32%) by the sentinel node technique with a median of 7 (range 2-14) lymph nodes and in 320 (68%) by systematic lymphadenectomy with a median of 19 (range 10-59) lymph nodes harvested. Residual tumor was histologically confirmed in 29% (n=136). In total, 270 patients (62%) were seeking pregnancy of which 196 (73%) succeeded. There were 205 live births with a median fetal weight of 2345 g (range 680-4010 g). Pre-term delivery occurred in 94 pregnancies (46%). After a median follow-up of 159 months (range 2-312), recurrences were detected in 16 patients (3.4%) of which 43% occurred later than 5 years after radical vaginal trachelectomy. Ten patients (2.1%) died of disease (five more than 5 years after radical vaginal trachelectomy). Overall survival, disease-free survival, and cancer-specific survival were 97.5%, 96.2%, and 97.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms oncologic safety of radical vaginal trachelectomy associated with a high chance for childbearing. High rate of pre-term delivery may be due to cervical volume loss. Our long-term oncologic data can serve as a benchmark for future modifications of fertility-sparing surgery.

[The COVID-pandemic and specialist training in Head and Neck oncology: A Survey among Physicians]. / Die COVID-19-Pandemie und ihr Einfluss auf die ärztliche Weiterbildung in der Kopf-Hals-Onkologie.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on the healthcare system and medical education. In this publication, the influence of the pandemic on the education of physicians active in Head and Neck oncology was examined using a survey. METHODS: A survey comprising 53 questions was conducted to gather data on work settings, daily activities, team events, and educational aspects during the pandemic. A total of 497 oncologists participated, including 131 individuals working in the field of Head and Neck oncology. This subgroup consisted of 99 (75.6%) radiation oncologists, 10 (7.6%) maxillofacial specialists, and 22 (16.8%) otolaryngologists. RESULTS: Nearly half of the participants reported experiencing increased clinical burden, which resulted in reduced engagement in scientific activities. Digital platforms became the predominant mode of continuing education, albeit with reduced accessibility. The pandemic significantly impacted clinical training that involved direct patient interaction. On the other hand, positive effects were observed in terms of cost and availability for external educational events such as conferences. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the detrimental effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on various aspects of medical education. While digitalization has accelerated in response, many physicians expressed a lack of professional interaction. Developing alternative digital learning platforms can provide a means to better cope with similar situations in the future. However, the importance of personal contact with colleagues and supervisors should not be overlooked when considering the quality of teaching.

Oncologic and Fertility Outcomes After Simple Trachelectomy in Women With Early Cervical Cancer.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to present our case series of patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing simple trachelectomy (ST). Currently, radical trachelectomy is considered the most appropriate fertility-preserving procedure for the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. However, there is increasing debate on the appropriate radicality of the surgery to preserve oncologic safety. DESIGN: Descriptive retrospective analysis of patient records and evaluation of questionnaires. SETTING: 2 gynecologic oncologic centers, surgeries performed by one surgical team. PATIENTS: 36 women with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing ST. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic assisted simple vaginal trachelectomy. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic, histologic, fertility, and follow-up data of all patients who underwent ST between April 2007 and July 2021 were prospectively recorded and retrospectively analyzed. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 36 women (mean age: 28 years) underwent ST of whom 81% were nulliparous. Indications for ST were multifocal International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA1 (n = 30), stage IA1 L1 (n = 1), stage IA2 (n = 2), and stage IB1 (n = 3). Mandatory staging procedure was laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy, including bilateral sentinel biopsy in 92% of the cases and systematic in 8%. Residual tumor was histologically confirmed in 8 specimens (22%); 18 women (50%) were seeking parenthood, and 13 succeeded (72%). There were 16 live births, all on term, with a median fetal weight of 3110 grams (2330-4420). One patient had a medical abortion owing to fetal congenital malformation. One pregnancy is ongoing. After a median follow-up of 91.5 months (9-174), all women are alive with no evidence of disease. CONCLUSION: ST represents a de-escalation compared with radical trachelectomy and provides excellent oncologic results with an outstanding fertility rate and obstetric outcome for patients with early cervical cancer. However, clear indications for this tailored fertility-preserving surgery have to be defined in well-designed trials.

Dual-tracer PET/CT protocol with [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 outperforms single-tracer PET/CT with [18F]FDG in different cancer types, resulting in larger functional and gross tumor volume.

PURPOSE: Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) detected by positron-emission tomography (PET) using fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) appears to be a promising target for cancer imaging, staging, and therapy, providing added value and strength as a complement to [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in cancer imaging. We recently introduced a combined single-session/dual-tracer protocol with [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI for cancer imaging and staging. Malignant tissue visualization and target-to-background uptake ratios (TBRs) as well as functional tumor volume (FTV) and gross tumor volume (GTV) were assessed in the present study with single-tracer [18F]FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) and with dual-tracer [18F]FDG&[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT. METHODS: A total of 19 patients with head and neck and gastrointestinal cancers received initial [18F]FDG-PET/CT followed by dual-tracer PET/CT after additional injection of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 during the same medical appointment (on average 13.9 ± 12.3 min after injection of [18F]FDG). Two readers visually compared detection rate of malignant tissue, TBR, FTV, and GTV for tumor and metastatic tissue in single- and dual-tracer PET/CT. RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of dual-tracer compared to single-tracer PET/CT was equal in 13 patients and superior in 6 patients. The mean TBRs of tumors and metastases in dual-tracer PET/CTs were mostly higher compared to single-tracer PET/CT using maximal count rates (CRmax). GTV and FTV were significantly larger when measured on dual-tracer compared to single-tracer PET/CT. CONCLUSION: Dual-tracer PET/CT with [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 showed better visualization due to a generally higher TBR and larger FTV and GTV compared to [18F]FDG-PET/CT in several tumor entities, suggesting that [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 provides added value in pretherapeutic staging.

Fertility sparing therapy in women with lymph node negative cervical cancer >2cm - oncologic and fertility outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical vaginal trachelectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Simple or radical trachelectomy are accepted fertility sparing therapies for patients diagnosed with cervical cancer ≤2 cm. In patients with larger tumors a fertility sparing concept is considered experimental. The aim of our study is to present oncological and fertility outcomes of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent radical vaginal trachelectomy. These procedures were performed in two centers in patients diagnosed with cervical cancer of diameter >2 cm. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed the demographic, histological, fertility and follow-up data of all patients with cervical cancer assessed as stage IB2, IB3 or IIA1 under the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 system. These patients had undergone pelvic lymphadenectomy, followed by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical vaginal trachelectomy between February 2006 and June 2020 at Charité University Berlin and Asklepios Hospital, Hamburg. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients (mean age 29.5 years, range; 26-40) underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical vaginal trachelectomy in case of proven tumor-free lymph nodes. Twenty-six (84%) of these patients were nulliparous. Across all 31 patients, the initial tumor stages were FIGO 2018 stage IB2 (n=27), IB3 (n=3) and IIA1 (n=1).Lymphadenectomy was completed in all but one patient (sentinel) with a median of 33 (range; 11-47) pelvic lymph nodes. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen was two cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin in 17 patients; three cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin in eight patients; two cycles of paclitaxel and cisplatin in four patients; two cylces cisplatin monoagent in one patient; and two cycles of paclitaxel and cisplatin followed by two cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin in one patient. Residual tumor was histologically confirmed in 17 specimens (55%). The median residual tumor size following neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 12 mm (range; 1-60). Fertility could be preserved in 27 patients (87%); two patients underwent adjuvant chemoradiation after radical vaginal trachelectomy due to high-risk histological features; two other patients underwent radical hysterectomy with adjuvant chemoradiation therapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of 18 (67%) patients seeking motherhood, 13 became pregnant (72%). There were 12 live births in 10 women, with a median fetal weight of 2490 grams (range; 1640-3560) and five miscarriages. After a median follow-up of 94.5 months (range; 6-183) three recurrences (11.1%) were detected, one patient (3.7%) died of the disease. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical vaginal trachelectomy may be offered to patients seeking motherhood with cervical cancer >2 cm and histopathologically tumor-free lymph nodes, the rate of healthy baby pregnancy on discharge was 10/18 women (55%). This fertility-preserving strategy is associated with higher recurrence and death compared with what was published in the literature for women undergoing radical vaginal trachelectomy for tumors up to 2 cm.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on training conditions and education in oncologic disciplines: a survey-based analysis.

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to changes in global health care. Medical societies had to update guidelines and enhance new services such as video consultations. Cancer treatment had to be modified. The aim of this study is to ensure optimal care for cancer patients with the help of high-quality training even in times of crisis. We therefore conducted a nationwide survey of physicians in training in oncological disciplines during the pandemic to assess the impact on their education. METHODS: The survey was sent to tumour centres, hospitals, specialist societies, and working and junior research groups and distributed via newsletters and homepages. Interim results and a call for participation were published as a poster (DEGRO) [26] and in the German Cancer Society (DKG) journal FORUM [42]. The survey contained 53 questions on conditions of education and training and on clinical and scientific work. Statistics were carried out with LimeSurvey and SPSS (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). RESULTS: Between February and November 2022, 450 participants answered the survey, with radio-oncologists being the largest group (28%). Most colleagues (63%) had access to digital training methods. Virtual sessions were rated as a good alternative, especially as multidisciplinary meetings (54%) as well as in-house and external training programs (48%, 47%). The time spent by training supervisors on education was rated as less than before the pandemic by 57%. Half of all participants perceived communication (54%), motivation (44%) and atmosphere (50%) in the team as bad. The participants felt strongly burdened by extra work (55%) and by a changed team atmosphere (49%). One third felt a change in the quality of training during the pandemic and rated it as negative (35%). According to 37% of the participants, this had little influence on their own quality of work. Additional subgroup analyses revealed significant differences in gender, specialty and education level. CONCLUSION: In order to improve oncology training in times of crisis, access to digital training options and meetings should be ensured. Participants wish for regular team meetings in person to enable good team spirit, compensation for overtime work and sufficient time for training supervisors for discussion and feedback.

Efficacy and Toxicity of Robotic Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy of Lung Metastases in Patients With Oligometastatic Disease.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is a locally effective treatment for lung metastases in patients with oligometastatic disease, a modern variant of which is robotic (rSBRT). Since it is unclear which factors determine the success of rSBRT, we investigated a cohort of patients with lung metastases treated with rSBRT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In our retrospective single-center analysis, we included patients with oligometastatic disease of different cancer types who underwent SBRT of lung metastases using an Accuray Cyberknife® device between 2012 and 2019. We evaluated local control rate (LC), progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival, and toxicity. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with the efficacy and toxicity of rSBRT. RESULTS: A total of 70 lung metastases of 54 patients were evaluated. The 4-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for LC, PFS and OS were 72.0%, 12.4% and 49.7%, respectively. Cox regression showed that LC of metastases of colorectal carcinoma and metastases treated with a biological effective dose at an α/ß-ratio of 10 (BED10) of <100 Gy was significantly worse than for other metastases. Patients suffered from grade I-II pneumonitis in 21.4% of cases treated with rSBRT (grade I: 20.0%; grade II: 1.4%). CONCLUSION: rSBRT is an effective and safe therapy for lung metastases. A BED10 of >100 Gy should be aimed for, especially for potentially radioresistant histologies such as colorectal carcinoma.

Radiation Therapy in the German Hodgkin Study Group HD 16 and HD 17 Trials: Quality Assurance and Dosimetric Analysis for Hodgkin Lymphoma in the Modern Era.

Purpose: Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral part of treatment concepts for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. This analysis reports on RT quality in the recent HD16 and 17 trials of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). Methods and Materials: All RT plans of involved-node radiation therapy (INRT) in HD 17 were requested for analysis, along with 100 and 50 involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) plans in HD 16 and 17, respectively. A structured assessment regarding field design and protocol adherence was performed by the reference radiation oncology panel of the GHSG. Results: Overall, 100 (HD 16) and 176 (HD 17) patients were eligible for analysis. In HD 16, 84% of RT series were evaluated as correct, with significant improvement compared with the predecessor studies (P < .001). In HD 17, 76.1% of INRT cases revealed a correct RT design compared with 69.0% of IFRT-cases, which was superior to previous studies (P < .001). Comparing INRT and IFRT, we found no significant differences in the percentage of any deviation (P = .418) or major deviations (P = .466). Regarding dosimetry, INRT was accompanied by an improvement in thyroid doses. Comparing different RT techniques, we found that intensity-modulated RT showed a reduction of high doses in the lung at the expense of an increased low-dose exposure in HD 17. Conclusions: The latest study generation of the GHSG demonstrates an improved quality in RT. A modern INRT design could be established without deterioration in quality. On a conceptual level, an individual consideration of the appropriate RT technique has to be performed.

Toxicity of dose-escalated radiotherapy up to 84 Gy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The outcome of radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PCA) depends on the delivered dose. While the evidence for dose-escalated RT up to 80 gray (Gy) is well established, there have been only few studies examining dose escalation above 80 Gy. We initiated the present study to assess the safety of dose escalation up to 84 Gy. METHODS: In our retrospective analysis, we included patients who received dose-escalated RT for PCA at our institution between 2016 and 2021. We evaluated acute genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity as well as late GU and GI toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients could be evaluated, of whom 24 patients had received 80 Gy and 62 patients 84 Gy (35 without pelvic and 27 with pelvic radiotherapy). Regarding acute toxicities, no > grade 2 adverse events occurred. Acute GU/GI toxicity of grade 2 occurred in 12.5%/12.5% of patients treated with 80 Gy, in 25.7%/14.3% of patients treated with 84 Gy to the prostate only, and in 51.9%/12.9% of patients treated with 84 Gy and the pelvis included. Late GU/GI toxicity of grade ≥ 2 occurred in 4.2%/8.3% of patients treated with 80 Gy, in 7.1%/3.6% of patients treated with 84 Gy prostate only, and in 18.2%/0% of patients treated with 84 Gy pelvis included (log-rank test p = 0.358). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that dose-escalated RT for PCA up to 84 Gy is feasible and safe without a significant increase in acute toxicity. Further follow-up is needed to assess late toxicity and survival.

Exercise interventions for adults with cancer receiving radiation therapy alone.

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy (RT) is given to about half of all people with cancer. RT alone is used to treat various cancers at different stages. Although it is a local treatment, systemic symptoms may occur. Cancer- or treatment-related side effects can lead to a reduction in physical activity, physical performance, and quality of life (QoL). The literature suggests that physical exercise can reduce the risk of various side effects of cancer and cancer treatments, cancer-specific mortality, recurrence of cancer, and all-cause mortality. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of exercise plus standard care compared with standard care alone in adults with cancer receiving RT alone. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL, conference proceedings and trial registries up to 26 October 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled people who were receiving RT without adjuvant systemic treatment for any type or stage of cancer. We considered any type of exercise intervention, defined as a planned, structured, repetitive, objective-oriented physical activity programme in addition to standard care. We excluded exercise interventions that involved physiotherapy alone, relaxation programmes, and multimodal approaches that combined exercise with other non-standard interventions such as nutritional restriction. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodology and the GRADE approach for assessing the certainty of the evidence. Our primary outcome was fatigue and the secondary outcomes were QoL, physical performance, psychosocial effects, overall survival, return to work, anthropometric measurements, and adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: Database searching identified 5875 records, of which 430 were duplicates. We excluded 5324 records and the remaining 121 references were assessed for eligibility. We included three two-arm RCTs with 130 participants. Cancer types were breast and prostate cancer. Both treatment groups received the same standard care, but the exercise groups also participated in supervised exercise programmes several times per week while undergoing RT. Exercise interventions included warm-up, treadmill walking (in addition to cycling and stretching and strengthening exercises in one study), and cool-down. In some analysed endpoints (fatigue, physical performance, QoL), there were baseline differences between exercise and control groups. We were unable to pool the results of the different studies owing to substantial clinical heterogeneity. All three studies measured fatigue. Our analyses, presented below, showed that exercise may reduce fatigue (positive SMD values signify less fatigue; low certainty). • Standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27 to 1.64; 37 participants (fatigue measured with Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)) • SMD 2.42, 95% CI 1.71 to 3.13; 54 participants (fatigue measured with BFI) • SMD 1.44, 95% CI 0.46 to 2.42; 21 participants (fatigue measured with revised Piper Fatigue Scale) All three studies measured QoL, although one provided insufficient data for analysis. Our analyses, presented below, showed that exercise may have little or no effect on QoL (positive SMD values signify better QoL; low certainty). • SMD 0.40, 95% CI -0.26 to 1.05; 37 participants (QoL measured with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate) • SMD 0.47, 95% CI -0.40 to 1.34; 21 participants (QoL measured with World Health Organization QoL questionnaire (WHOQOL-BREF)) All three studies measured physical performance. Our analyses of two studies, presented below, showed that exercise may improve physical performance, but we are very unsure about the results (positive SMD values signify better physical performance; very low certainty) • SMD 1.25, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.97; 37 participants (shoulder mobility and pain measured on a visual analogue scale) • SMD⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠ 3.13 (95% CI 2.32 to 3.95; 54 participants (physical performance measured with the six-minute walk test) Our analyses of data from the third study showed that exercise may have little or no effect on physical performance measured with the stand-and-sit test, but we are very unsure about the results (SMD 0.00, 95% CI -0.86 to 0.86, positive SMD values signify better physical performance; 21 participants; very low certainty). Two studies measured psychosocial effects. Our analyses (presented below) showed that exercise may have little or no effect on psychosocial effects, but we are very unsure about the results (positive SMD values signify better psychosocial well-being; very low certainty). • SMD 0.48, 95% CI -0.18 to 1.13; 37 participants (psychosocial effects measured on the WHOQOL-BREF social subscale) • SMD 0.29, 95% CI -0.57 to 1.15; 21 participants (psychosocial effects measured with the Beck Depression Inventory) Two studies recorded adverse events related to the exercise programmes and reported no events. We estimated the certainty of the evidence as very low. No studies reported adverse events unrelated to exercise. No studies reported the other outcomes we intended to analyse (overall survival, anthropometric measurements, return to work). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is little evidence on the effects of exercise interventions in people with cancer who are receiving RT alone. While all included studies reported benefits for the exercise intervention groups in all assessed outcomes, our analyses did not consistently support this evidence. There was low-certainty evidence that exercise improved fatigue in all three studies. Regarding physical performance, our analysis showed very low-certainty evidence of a difference favouring exercise in two studies, and very low-certainty evidence of no difference in one study. We found very low-certainty evidence of little or no difference between the effects of exercise and no exercise on quality of life or psychosocial effects. We downgraded the certainty of the evidence for possible outcome reporting bias, imprecision due to small sample sizes in a small number of studies, and indirectness of outcomes. In summary, exercise may have some beneficial outcomes in people with cancer who are receiving RT alone, but the evidence supporting this statement is of low certainty. There is a need for high-quality research on this topic.

Potential synergy between radiotherapy and CAR T-cells - a multicentric analysis of the role of radiotherapy in the combination of CAR T cell therapy.

BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has improved the limited overall survival (OS) of patients with intensively pretreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the potentially life-threatening toxicities of CAR T-cells and early relapses remain a challenge. As suggested by smaller monocentric analyses, radiotherapy (RT) in combination with CAR T-cells may have an immunomodulatory effect. METHOD/ RESULTS: In this multicentric retrospective analysis, we investigated potentially synergistic effects of RT and CAR T-cells. Of 78 patients from four centers who received CAR T-cell therapy for DLBCL, 37 patients underwent bridging RT or received salvage RT. RTs (median 36 gray) were well tolerated. Therapy response and disease control of CAR T-cell therapy were comparable after bridging RT or bridging systemic therapy. High-grade neurotoxicity tended to occur less frequently after bridging RT. After further disease progression, patients with localized relapses showed better outcomes, compared to those in advanced stage. In the subgroup with localized relapse, patients receiving salvage RT had an increased OS, vs. those without salvage RT (1-year OS rate 89% vs. 38%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Our analysis demonstrated that RT in combination with CAR T-cells led neither to high-grade toxicities, nor to a decreased response rate. We observed better outcomes of salvage therapies in patients with localized relapses vs. those with advanced stage relapses. Especially the patients who received salvage RTs for localized relapses seem to benefit more. Further analyses are necessary to clarify whether specific synergistic effects exist, such as an enhanced anti-tumor effect of CAR T-cells from RT sensitizing.

First Clinical Experience With [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46-PET/CT Versus [18F]F-FDG PET/CT for Nodal Staging in Cervical Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In several solid tumors, fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is overexpressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment. Preliminary evidence suggests that detection and staging are feasible with PET/CT imaging using [68Ga]-radiolabeled inhibitors of FAP also in cervical cancer (CC). Our study aims to explore the accuracy of [68Ga]Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI)-46 PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT compared with histopathological results of surgical lymph node (LN) staging before primary chemoradiation. METHODS: Seven consecutive women with treatment-naive and biopsy-proven locally advanced CC underwent both whole-body [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46- and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT, for imaging nodal staging before systematic laparoscopic lymphadenectomy of the pelvic and para-aortic region. Location and number of suspicious LNs in PET imaging were recorded and compared with the results of histopathological analysis, including immunohistochemical staining for FAP. RESULTS: All 7 patients had focal uptake above background in their tumor lesions in [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT showed a higher tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) in primary tumor as well as in LN metastasis. Median TBRmax values using liver were 32.02 and 5.15 for [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT, respectively. Median TBRmax using blood pool was 18.45 versus 6.85 for [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT, respectively. Higher TBR also applies for nodal metastasis: TBRmax was 14.55 versus 1.39 (liver) and 7.97 versus 1.8 (blood pool) for [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT, respectively. Overall, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT detected more lesions compared with [18F]F-FDG PET/CT. Following surgical staging, a total of 5 metastatic LNs could be pathologically confirmed, of which 2 and 4 were positive by [18F]F-FDG PET/CT and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, respectively. CONCLUSION: [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT seems useful to improve detection of nodal metastasis in patients with CCs. Future studies should aim to compare [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT to surgical staging of pelvic and para-aortic LNs in patients with locally advanced CC.

Teaching in radiation oncology: now and 2025-results of a focus group with medical students.

PURPOSE: In Germany, the new Licensing Regulations for Physicians 2025 (Ärztliche Approbationsordnung, ÄApprO) define a binding legal framework on the basis of which medical faculties modernize their curricula. Since 2015, the National Competence Based Learning Objectives Catalogue for Medicine 2.0 (Nationaler Kompetenzbasierter Lernzielkatalog 2.0., NKLM) formulates competencies and learning objectives to be achieved in the course of studies as curriculum orientation for the medical faculties. In addition, about 80% of the areas of a new core curriculum are to be made compulsory. A needs analysis in the target group of students has not yet taken place for the subject of radiation therapy (RT) or radiation oncology (RO). This study therefore surveys the experiences and requirements of students regarding medical education in RT. METHODS: Qualitative single-center study using a semistructured in-depth focus group with 11 medical students (20-26 years; 6 female, 5 male) was conducted. Brainstorming sessions were conducted in small groups and individually; oral contributions were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis according to Mayring. Results were compared with the content of the future curriculum and reviewed for congruence with current expert recommendations of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Radioonkologie, DEGRO). RESULTS: The plans to develop a longitudinal and practice-oriented curriculum was positively received by students. Specifically, students wanted to introduce the basics of RT as an early link to practice in preclinical teaching units. The necessary acquisition of communicative skills should also be taught by lecturers in RO. Methodologically, regular digital survey tools for self-monitoring, discussion rooms, and problem-based learning were named. In the perception of students, the subject appears underrepresented in relation to its relevance in the multimodal therapy of oncological diseases. CONCLUSION: Results of the needs analysis for the subject of RT are consistent with ÄApprO, NKLM, and DEGRO. Moreover, they complement them and should be considered in the curriculum development of Masterplan Medical Education 2020 (Masterplan Medizinstudium 2020). The results contribute to high-quality and target-group-oriented medical training in the subject of RT, increased visibility, and thus early bonding of future physicians to RO in Germany.

Chemoradiation for elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal cancer: a retrospective single-center analysis.

BACKGROUND: Present studies on the efficacy and safety of curative chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with esophageal cancer reflect heterogenous results especially in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of CRT in patients ≥ 65 years. In a cohort, the focus centered around treatment-related toxicity (CTCAE Grade > 3), overall survival as well as progression free survival, comparing these rates in-between patients older than 70 years to those younger than 70 years. METHODS: A total of 67 patients older than 65 years (34 (50.7%) were older than 70 years) met the inclusion criteria for retrospective analysis (period from January 2013 to October 2017). Treatment consisted of radiotherapy and chemotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel or fluorouracil (5-FU)/cisplatin with the intention of neoadjuvant or definite chemoradiation. A sum of 67 patients received CRT (44 (65.6%) patients in neoadjuvant, 23 (34.4%) in definite intent). Of these, 22 and 12 patients were older than 70 years (50% and 52.2% in both treatment groups, respectively). Median age was 71 years and patients had a good physical performance status (ECOG 0: 57.6%, ECOG 1: 27.3%). Median follow-up was 24 months. Most patients had advanced tumour stages (T3 stage: n = 51, 79.7%) and nodal metastasis (N1 stage: n = 54, 88.5%). A subgroup comparison was conducted between patients aged ≤ 70 years and > 70 years. RESULTS: In severe (CTCAE Grade 3-5) toxicities (acute and late), no significant differences were observed between both patient groups (< 70 years vs. > 70 years). 21% had acute grade 3 events, 4 patients (4%) had grade 4 events, and two patients (3%) had one grade 5 event. Late toxicity after CRT was grade 1 in 13 patients (22%), grade 2 in two (3%), grade 3 in two (3%), grade 4 in four (7%), and grade 5 in one (2%). Median overall survival (OS) of all patients was 30 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16 months. No significant differences were seen for OS (32 months vs. 25 months; p = 0.632) and PFS (16 months vs. 12 months; p = 0.696) between older patients treated with curative intent and younger ones. Trimodal therapy significantly prolonged both OS and PFS (p = 0.005; p = 0.018), regardless of age. CONCLUSION: CRT in elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with esophageal cancer is feasible and effective. Numbers for acute and late toxicities can be compared to cohorts of younger patients (< 65 years) with EC who received the same therapies. Age at treatment initiation alone should not be the determining factor. Instead, functional status, risk of treatment-related morbidities, life expectancy and patient´s preferences should factor into the choice of therapy.

Head-to-Head Comparison of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46-PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG-PET/CT for Radiotherapy Planning in Head and Neck Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In head and neck cancers (HNCs), fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is expressed by cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumor microenvironment. Preliminary evidence suggests that detection and staging is feasible with positron emission tomography (PET/CT) imaging using [68 Ga]-radiolabeled inhibitors of FAP ([68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46) in HNCs. This study aims to compare [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and [18F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose ([18F]F-FDG) PET/CT with a focus on improved target volume definition and radiotherapy planning in patients with HNC referred for chemoradiation. METHODS: A total of 15 patients with HNCs received both [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT with a thermoplastic mask, in addition to initial tumor staging by conventional imaging with contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI. Mean intervals between FAPI/FDG and FAPI/conventional imaging were 4 ± 20 and 17 ± 18 days, respectively. Location and number of suspicious lesions revealed by the different procedures were recorded. Subsequently, expert-generated gross tumor volumes (GTVs) based on conventional imaging were compared to those based on [18F]F-FDG and [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT to measure the impact on subsequent radiation planning. RESULTS: All patients had focal FAPI uptake above background in tumor lesions. Compared to FDG, tumor uptake (median SUVmax 10.2 vs. 7.3, p = 0.008) and tumor-to-background ratios were significantly higher with FAPI than with FDG (SUVmean liver: 9.3 vs. 3.2, p < 0.001; SUVmean bloodpool: 6.9 vs. 4.0, p < 0.001). A total of 49 lesions were recorded. Of these, 40 (82%) were FDG+ and 41 (84%) were FAP+. There were 5 (10%) FAP+/FDG- lesions and 4 (8%) FAP-/FDG+ lesions. Volumetrically, a significant difference was found between the GTVs (median 57.9 ml in the FAPI-GTV, 42.5 ml in the FDG-GTV, compared to 39.2 ml in the conventional-GTV). Disease stage identified by FAPI PET/CT was mostly concordant with FDG PET/CT. Compared to conventional imaging, five patients (33%) were upstaged following imaging with FAPI and FDG PET/CT. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 -PET/CT is useful for detecting tumor lesions in patients with HNCs. There is now a need for prospective randomized studies to confirm the role of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT in relation to [18F]F-FDG PET/CT in HNCs and to evaluate its impact on clinical outcome.

Dual-Tracer PET/CT Protocol with [18F]-FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 for Cancer Imaging: A Proof of Concept.

Imaging studies with PET tracers acting as fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FAPIs) show promising results that could usefully complement [18F]-FDG in cancer imaging. Methods: All patients received [18F]-FDG PET/CT and dual-tracer PET/CT after an additional injection of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 after the [18F]-FDG PET/CT. Two readers visually compared detection rate and analyzed target-to-background ratios for tumor and metastatic tissue in single- and dual-tracer PET/CT. Results: Detection rate in dual-tracer PET/CT was visually as good as that in single-tracer PET/CT in 4 patients and superior in 2 patients, whereas target-to-background ratios were significantly higher in dual-tracer PET/CT. Conclusion: Dual-tracer [18F]-FDG/[68Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT within a single session is feasible and has potential. The dual-tracer approach may have superior sensitivity to [18F]-FDG PET/CT alone without compromising individual assessment of either scan.

Oncologic Outcome and Immune Responses of Radiotherapy with Anti-PD-1 Treatment for Brain Metastases Regarding Timing and Benefiting Subgroups.

While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with radiotherapy (RT) are widely used for patients with brain metastasis (BM), markers that predict treatment response for combined RT and ICI (RT-ICI) and their optimal dosing and sequence for the best immunogenic effects are still under investigation. The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic factors for therapeutic outcome and to compare effects of concurrent and non-concurrent RT-ICI. We retrospectively analyzed data of 93 patients with 319 BMs of different cancer types who received PD-1 inhibitors and RT at the University Hospital Cologne between September/2014 and November/2020. Primary study endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC). We included 66.7% melanoma, 22.8% lung, and 5.5% other cancer types with a mean follow-up time of 23.8 months. Median OS time was 12.19 months. LC at 6 months was 95.3% (concurrent) vs. 69.2% (non-concurrent; p = 0.008). Univariate Cox regression analysis detected following prognostic factors for OS: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio NLR favoring <3 (low; HR 2.037 (1.184−3.506), p = 0.010), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) favoring ≤ULN (HR 1.853 (1.059−3.241), p = 0.031), absence of neurological symptoms (HR 2.114 (1.285−3.478), p = 0.003), RT concept favoring SRS (HR 1.985 (1.112−3.543), p = 0.019), RT dose favoring ≥60 Gy (HR 0.519 (0.309−0.871), p = 0.013), and prior anti-CTLA4 treatment (HR 0.498 (0.271−0.914), p = 0.024). Independent prognostic factors for OS were concurrent RT-ICI application (HR 0.539 (0.299−0.971), p = 0.024) with a median OS of 17.61 vs. 6.83 months (non-concurrent), ECOG performance status favoring 0 (HR 7.756 (1.253−6.061), p = 0.012), cancer type favoring melanoma (HR 0.516 (0.288−0.926), p = 0.026), BM volume (PTV) favoring ≤3 cm3 (HR 1.947 (1.007−3.763), p = 0.048). Subgroups with the following factors showed significantly longer OS when being treated concurrently: RT dose <60 Gy (p = 0.014), PTV > 3 cm3 (p = 0.007), other cancer types than melanoma (p = 0.006), anti-CTLA4-naïve patients (p < 0.001), low NLR (p = 0.039), steroid intake ≤4 mg (p = 0.042). Specific immune responses, such as abscopal effects (AbEs), pseudoprogression (PsP), or immune-related adverse events (IrAEs), occurred more frequently with concurrent RT-ICI and resulted in better OS. Other toxicities, including radionecrosis, were not statistically different in both groups. The concurrent application of RT and ICI, the ECOG-PS, cancer type, and PTV had an independently prognostic impact on OS. In concurrently treated patients, treatment response (LC) was delayed and specific immune responses (AbE, PsP, IrAE) occurred more frequently with longer OS rates. Our results suggest that concurrent RT-ICI application is more beneficial than sequential treatment in patients with low pretreatment inflammatory status, more and larger BMs, and with other cancer types than melanoma.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus intensity-modulated proton therapy in the irradiation of infra diaphragmatic Hodgkin Lymphoma in female patients.

PURPOSE: To investigate the role of infra diaphragmatic intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for female Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients and to estimate the risk of secondary cancer and ovarian failure. METHODS: A comparative treatment planning study was performed on 14 patients, and the results were compared according to conventional dose-volume metrics. In addition, estimates of the excess absolute risk (EAR) of secondary cancer induction were determined for the bowel, the bladder and the rectum. For the ovaries, the risk of ovarian failure was estimated. RESULTS: The dosimetric findings demonstrate the equivalence between VMAT and IMPT in terms of target coverage. A statistically significant reduction of the mean and near-to-maximum doses was proven for the organs at risk. The EAR ratio estimated for IMPT to VMAT was 0.51 ± 0.32, 0.32 ± 0.35 and 0.05 ± 0.11 for the bowel, bladder and rectum, respectively. Concerning the risk of ovarian failure for the chronologic age ranging from 18 to 46 years, the expected net loss in fertility years ranged from 4.8 to 3.0 years for protons and 12.0 to 5.7 years for photons. CONCLUSION: This in-silico study confirmed the beneficial role of IMPT from a dosimetric point of view. Mathematical models suggested that the use of protons might be further advantageous due to the expected reduction of the risk of secondary cancer induction and its milder impact on the reduction of fertility.